Posted by
netfotoj on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:16:21 AM
I’m on vacation in Chatauqua,
N.Y., but unfortunately, not on vacation from politics. Barack Obama was here
before I arrived at this quiet enclave on the shores of Lake Chautauqua in the
southwestern corner of New York state, 30 miles from Lake Erie.
I’ve learned from previous summer
visits here with my wife’s family that a Southern Baptist church is not to be
found. I guess that’s why they’re called Southern. So after shopping around for
a friendly clime for Sunday worship, I’ve given up and settled for the
nondenominational service at Chautauqua Institute, a gated community noted for
its high-brow classical music roots and strongly liberal-left political
discussions.
I’ve heard a few good sermons
here: last year the Scottish chaplain to the Queen; the year before a black
minister from Maryland. But this year it was “Barack at Chautauq.”
So far as I know, his name was
never mentioned out loud, though I did arrive five minutes late so I may have
missed the Rev. Joan Brown Campbell, pastor of the Chautauqua Institution,
leading the congregants in a chant of “Yes, We Can!”
I did hear her remind those
gathered on the bare wooden pews of the open-to-the-outdoors amphitheatre that
this is “the political season,” perhaps a gentle forewarning for the main
speaker.
The Rev. LaVerne Gill, retired
black United Church of Christ pastor from Michigan and currently Chaplain
Administrator for the Chautauqua United Church of Christ, Inc., read the
Scripture from Luke 18:1-8, Jesus’ parable of the widow and the unjust judge.
The main speaker was the Rev.
Timothy Carl Ahrens, pastor of First Congregational Church, United Church of
Christ in Columbus, Ohio. Are you beginning to see a United Church of Christ
theme here?
In case you somehow missed the
youtube “G— D---- America!” ranting sermons of the Rev.
Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s pastor for 20 years at Trinity United
Church of Christ in Chicago, don’t worry. No such wild rantings came forth from
Ahrens, a calm, reasonable white minister, who also sounds totally unlike Father
Michael Pfleger, the post-Wright visiting white minister of youtube and Trinity
UCC pulpit fame.
But have no doubts that Ahrens is
a fellow traveler with Obama, Wright and Pfleger. The Chautauqua program notes
“Rev. Ahrens has been heralded as one among five pastors keeping alive the
social justice tradition of the late William
Sloan Coffin.”
Coffin, you may recall, was the
Yale chaplain who took a leadership role in the anti-war movement of the ‘60s,
among other causes du jour popular among the liberal-left. His anti-war antics
continued to his death in 2006, including opposing the 1991 war in the Persian
Gulf to liberate Kuwait after Saddam Hussein’s invasion from Iraq.
So there’s the common tie that
binds Obama, Wright, Pfleger, Coffin and Ahrens, “the social justice” gospel.
Ahrens used his text, Luke 18:1-8,
to illustrate the “social justice” gospel, turning Jesus’ words inside out and
backwards to make his point.
To paraphrase the parable, a
persistent widow seeks justice from an unjust judge, who finally gives in and
grants her request just to shut her up.
Jesus tells us what the parable
means in the opening verse, 18:1, “And he spake a parable unto them to this
end, that men ought always to pray and not to faint.”
Then Jesus sums up his point again
in the closing verses, 18-7-8, “Shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry
day and night unto him, though he bear long with them? I tell you he will
avenge them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of man cometh, shall he find
faith on the earth?”
So the point of the parable is
persistent faith, like the widow used on the unjust judge until he finally gave
in. Then Jesus turns from the unjust judge to God the Father, and says God will
not only hear the cries for justice from his own, “I tell you he will avenge
them speedily.”
The parable concludes with Jesus
asking that when he, the Son of man, comes to the earth, will he find this kind
of persistent faith on the earth? Or will he find the “social justice” gospel?
Ahrens answered “no” to Jesus’ question
and “yes” to my imagined latter question, turning the persistent widow into “an
organizer,” a forerunner, we must presume, of the young college graduate who
came to the south side of Chicago to work as a “community organizer” and launch
his career in liberal-left politics.
In furtherance of the “social
justice gospel” in his church and city, Ahrens said he has “organized,
mobilized and agitated” in Columbus, Ohio.
And just in case anybody didn’t
get how radical his gospel is, Ahrens made it clear by adding he is “sick and
tired of the religious right” and that part of the church in America.
Ahrens said Columbus “has the
highest poverty rate in Ohio” and that his church ministers to “the least, the
lost and the last” in his city.
But then he as much as admitted
that government “social justice” programs have not helped lower the poverty
rate in his city, saying political leaders have “wasted the tens of millions we
have trusted to their care.”
So what is the solution to replace
these failed government programs, such as welfare, that have resulted in more
poverty, not less? More “tens of millions” must be demanded of these “unjust
judges” he said. “Give them a black eye until justice is done.”
He then misinterpreted another act
of Jesus, saying he “liberated the poor by turning over the tables of the money
changers in the temple.” Wow, welfare in the Bible!?
And I thought that Jesus was chasing
the thieves out of his father’s house of worship.
Ahrens urged “political action” in
the churches, warning, “some of your congregants will not like this.” No
kidding.
And in case anybody missed the
“gospel according to Barack,” Ahrens called for churches to be “holy and
special agents for this change.”
So instead of doing as Jesus said, calling on God
for justice, who he promised will “avenge his own elect… I tell you he will
avenge them speedily,” the gospel according to Ahrens, Obama, Coffin, Wright
& Pfleger says to demand justice from the unjust judges.
Now there’s some real change. But
I sure don’t want to believe in this “other gospel.”